Nursery Nurse wrote:This thread interests me alot.
I find this quite strange as you obviously have no interest in cloth nappies so I'm a bit perplexed as to why you are interested in our discussion. Of course everyone is entitled to their opinion. I'll attempt to discuss the other side of the points that you have raised.
I work in a toddler room, Im a very experinced Nursery Nurse and to be completely honest Cloth Nappies make toilet training alot harder. From a nursery point of view Cloth nappies can be a pain. Changing a child so very often can be quite difficult to achieve.
I find this statement fairly uninformed. Modern cloth nappies need changing no more often than disposables and take no more time to change than one. Most parents who send their infants to nursery in cloth supply ones that have aplix (like velcro) fastenings or poppers which are very quick to remove and replace.
The urine is not taken away from the skin and in some cases the nappy actually smell of urine even after 30 minutes.
Again your lack of knowledge about cloth nappies is quite astounding considering you have come on here to criticise them. Modern cloth nappies often have a build in fleece layer that wicks urine away from the babies bottom in a manner at least as effective as a disposable. Those nappies that don't have a liner placed in them for the same reason.
Staff do not have the time to sit a child on the potty every 20 minutes when it takes just as long to put the the nappy back on. Your child is not the only child in the nursery please remeber this.
20 minutes to put a cloth nappy on - that's amazing it truly takes me but a moment!
I have read plenty of studies on the impact of washing/drying cloth nappies on the environment compared to disposable biodegradable nappies. Not every disposable nappy stays on land fills for god knows how many years. Cloth nappies have just as much impact on the environment as disposables.
please read below:
Yes I did read the first link (the 2nd didn't work). It's a shame that you only managed to read very out of date information. The environmental agency realised that their report was quite badly flawed and re-did the study in 2008. Below you will find a link to the WEN's page regarding the report.
http://www.wen.org.uk/general_pages/New ... .10.08.htmCloth nappies can also hinder walking. I have actually witnessed children struggling to walk because the cloth nappy is so large. Yes i understand that they are getting smaller but i firmly believe they are a hinderance. I once heard a parent comment how cute her son looked running in a cloth nappy. What she was actually watching was her sons legs compensating for the large nappy between his legs making him run strangley.
Actually cloth nappies give support to hips. Children with certain hip problems are often put in double thickness cloth nappies to correct issues with their hip development. This is what thenappylady.co.uk has to say
Yes, children in cloth nappies may well walk slightly differently from their peers in disposables, and lie with their legs more splayed, but they are not bandy legged.
Some paediatricians argue that the extra support of cloth provides better conditions for proper hip development, as well as spinal cushioning while the child learns to walk
this sentiment is repeated all over the information sources I have read regarding cloth nappies.
In the summer these nappies are far too warm. I have actually changed children out of cloth nappies as they have been too hot. Some cloth nappies consist of 3 layers of material.
This is again a hugely misinformed statement. Firstly most cloth nappies have far more than 3 layers! However disposables have layers of chemicals and plastic (1 cup of crude oil per nappy actually) which is far hotter. If you would like scientific proof of this then please refer to the 2000 study done in Germany. I have taken this information from The British Medical Journal, a peer reviewed highly respected medical journal.
Scrotal temperature is increased in disposable plastic lined nappies
C-J Partsch, M Aukamp, W G Sippell
Division of Paediatric Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, Christian-Albrechts- University of Kiel, Schwanenweg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
It is a long and detailed report so I have just replicated a small portion of it for you to get some idea of how incorrect your point is
The physiological temperature of the adult human testis has been reported as being between 31 and 35°C (table 2). To our knowledge, comparable data in healthy children are not available. One report on cryptorchid boys showed significantly higher testicular temperature on the cryptorchid than on the normally descended testis during operation.23 Similarly, significantly higher left testicular temperatures have been observed in patients with varicocele than in normal volunteers.24 An extensive review of the available literature (in part: table 2) showed that scrotal temperatures as high as those in infants wearing plastic lined nappies have not been observed before. In fact, the physiological cooling mechanism was blunted in all 48 boys wearing plastic lined, disposable nappies, and was completely abolished in 13 out of 48 (27%).
Even higher scrotal/testicular temperatures can be expected during the not infrequent feverish episodes in male infants and toddlers. In adults, short term testicular temperature elevations by sauna bath (elevation of rectal temperature by 0.93°C), or during acute febrile diseases were shown to suppress spermatogenesis.15 16 25 26 Thus, it seems to be possible that a prolonged and continuous elevation of testicular temperature by a mean of 1°C can affect the maturation of the infant testis. An increased testicular temperature and/or an impaired testiculoscrotal thermoregulation have deleterious effects on spermatogenesis.16 17 20 27 Moreover, mild testicular heating has been demonstrated to be effective as a means of reversible contraception in men.28 A lowering of the rectoscrotal temperature gradient in healthy men by 1°C to 2°C was accompanied by a suppression of spermatogenesis.20 27-29 From these and other studies, it can be concluded that an increase of testicular temperature by 1°C and/or a decrease of the rectoscrotal temperature difference by 1 to 2°C is significant for spermatogenesis in men. However, it must be admitted that the impact of a temperature increase of the observed magnitude on the developing testis of the male infant is still unknown. In addition to the effects of increased testicular temperature on spermatogenesis, the former may be one of the aetiological factors in testicular malignancy.30
Reference:
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2000;83:364-368; doi:10.1136/adc.83.4.364
Copyright © 2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child 2000;83:364-368 ( October )
Link if you would like to read the full report yourself (you do need to register):
http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/83/4/364this will probably be my only post. Please keep in mind these points.
That's a shame, I have taken the time to respond to you and I would like to hear your reply, that is how it normally works on a forum. However in this instance it seems you may have only posted to flame a response. I do hope you read what I have written, you may just learn something